Tech Projects, LLC
Tech Projects, LLC appealed a decision regarding jurisdiction over claims for costs incurred under two requirements that were ultimately withdrawn by the government. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Material Facts
- Tech Projects was accepted for a requirement to design and install a virtual fence by the Small Business Administration.
- The virtual fence requirement was withdrawn by the Army due to difficulties in obtaining information from Tech Projects.
- Tech Projects was also accepted for a requirement to operate and maintain target control services, which was later cancelled.
- Tech Projects submitted a certified claim for $185,346.40 for both requirements.
- The contracting officer determined that Tech Projects was entitled to reimbursement for a portion of its claim but denied a supplemental claim.
- The contracting officer acknowledged that there was an implied contract when SBA acceptance occurs.
Parties
- Appellant
- Tech Projects, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contracting Agency
- White Sands Missile Range
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Alderman Building Company, Inc.No. 58082May 21, 2020
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 61790December 18, 2019
- Arab Shah Construction CompanyNo. 61565November 4, 2019
- PIKA-Pirnie JV, LLCNo. 61597November 4, 2019
- Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc.No. 61535July 22, 2019
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026