Thorpe See-Op Corporation
Thorpe See-Op Corporation appealed two decisions regarding a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract, asserting that the government's claims were barred by the statute of limitations. The Board denied both parties' motions for summary judgment.
Material Facts
- The government awarded Contract No. W911 W6-05-C-0047, a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for $500,000, to Thorpe See-Op Corporation on 24 January 2005.
- The contract amount was increased to $570,000 on 9 May 2005.
- The government ordered appellant to stop work on 5 June 2005.
- The contracting officer issued a unilateral modification terminating the contract for convenience on 22 August 2005.
- Appellant submitted a settlement proposal on 9 October 2006, seeking payment of $25,171.51.
- The termination contracting officer informed appellant on 28 February 2008 that its books and records were not auditable.
- On 24 July 2008, the termination contracting officer informed appellant that it owed the government $213,173.44.
- Appellant presented two revised termination settlement proposals in May 2011, ultimately requesting $339,071.88.
- On 15 July 2013, the contracting officer issued Modification No. A0004, demanding that appellant pay the government $193,773.
- Appellant presented a certified claim in the amount of $579,140.19 on 12 August 2013.
Parties
- Appellant
- Thorpe See-Op Corporation
- Contract Number
- W911 W6-05-C-0047
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- WEB LLC/WEBCONo. 63676September 23, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64235, 64236September 23, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64199August 4, 2026
- Weil Construction, Inc.No. 62742, 63155, 64045July 29, 2026
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026