5896058961

Thorpe See-Op Corporation

December 4, 2014Judge McIlmail
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationCDA JurisdictionStatute of Limitations / TimelinessDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Thorpe See-Op Corporation appealed two decisions regarding a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract, asserting that the government's claims were barred by the statute of limitations. The Board denied both parties' motions for summary judgment.

Material Facts

  • The government awarded Contract No. W911 W6-05-C-0047, a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for $500,000, to Thorpe See-Op Corporation on 24 January 2005.
  • The contract amount was increased to $570,000 on 9 May 2005.
  • The government ordered appellant to stop work on 5 June 2005.
  • The contracting officer issued a unilateral modification terminating the contract for convenience on 22 August 2005.
  • Appellant submitted a settlement proposal on 9 October 2006, seeking payment of $25,171.51.
  • The termination contracting officer informed appellant on 28 February 2008 that its books and records were not auditable.
  • On 24 July 2008, the termination contracting officer informed appellant that it owed the government $213,173.44.
  • Appellant presented two revised termination settlement proposals in May 2011, ultimately requesting $339,071.88.
  • On 15 July 2013, the contracting officer issued Modification No. A0004, demanding that appellant pay the government $193,773.
  • Appellant presented a certified claim in the amount of $579,140.19 on 12 August 2013.

Parties

Appellant
Thorpe See-Op Corporation
Contract Number
W911 W6-05-C-0047
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.