59020

Public Warehousing Company, K.S.C.

May 2, 2016Judge Thrasher
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationCDA JurisdictionStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

Public Warehousing Company, K.S.C. appealed the denial of its claim for interest penalties under the Prompt Payment Act, which the government sought to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and moved for summary judgment.

Material Facts

  • Public Warehousing Company, K.S.C. (PWC) appealed from the denial of its 5 December 2011 certified claim.
  • PWC sought $4,605,594.53 in interest penalties allegedly due pursuant to the Prompt Payment Act.
  • The government moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, alleging portions of the claim were barred by the CDA's six-year statute of limitations.
  • The Board requested supplemental briefing regarding the impact of Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States on the government's motion.
  • The Prompt Payment Act requires agencies to pay interest penalties if payments are not made by the required date.
  • The contracts at issue included clauses stating that payment would be made in accordance with the Prompt Payment Act.

Parties

Appellant
Public Warehousing Company, K.S.C.
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contracting Agency
Defense Supply Center Philadelphia
Contract Number
SP0300-03-D-3061
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.