Weatherford Group, Inc.
Weatherford Group, Inc. appealed for reimbursement of costs related to military air travel services, asserting that the contract required the government to provide these services at no cost. The Board denied the appeals, finding that the contract allocated cost responsibility to the contractor.
Material Facts
- The Army awarded Contract No. W91JA4-11-C-4005 to Weatherford Group, Inc. on 14 January 2011.
- The contract required Weatherford to provide support services for military personnel in Afghanistan.
- The contract included a clause summarizing government support, including military air travel services.
- The Statement of Work specified that the contractor was responsible for certain employee travel costs.
- Weatherford used military air travel services and received vouchers for reimbursement from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service totaling $56,526.
- Weatherford paid the vouchers and submitted two requests for equitable adjustment totaling $58,110, which were denied by the contracting officer.
Parties
- Appellant
- Weatherford Group, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91JA4-11-C-4005
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 58030, 58593, 58594, 58660, 59212, 59220, 59813, 60376, 60403, 60411, 60522, 60736August 20, 2018
- Telford Aviation, Inc.No. 60040, 60876July 11, 2018
- Environmental Chemical CorporationNo. 60577June 15, 2018
- ECCI-C METAG, JVNo. 59667June 1, 2018
- KiewitPhelpsNo. 60850May 23, 2018
- New South Construction Company, Inc.No. 61314May 23, 2018
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026