AAR Airlift Group, Inc.
AAR Airlift Group, Inc. sought additional payment for helicopter transportation services allegedly provided in Afghanistan in November 2013. The Board denied the appeal because the evidence showed a shortage of required S-61 pilots on the disputed days.
Material Facts
- In 2010, the parties contracted for AAR to provide approximately 50 helicopters for transporting supplies, mail, and passengers in Afghanistan.
- The contract allowed each aircraft six days per month for scheduled or unscheduled maintenance and addressed prorated payment for additional non-mission-capable days.
- The contract stated that an aircraft was not available unless both the airframe was Fully Mission Capable and the aircrew was available as defined by the FAA or comparable regulations.
- For November 2013, the unit price for CLINs 3002 and 3003 was $456,187 each.
- AAR identified N364FH as an operational spare for N391AL on November 1, 2013, and for N3897N on November 4-8, 10-12, and 15-16, 2013.
- N391AL and N3897N were non-mission-capable on the corresponding disputed dates.
- The contemporaneous situation reports showed that AAR had fewer S-61 pilots than required on each disputed day.
- The November 1, 2013 situation report showed that AAR required 14 S-61 pilots but had only 10 available.
- The November 1, 2013 situation report showed that AAR had only three SICs for the five S-61s listed.
- The November 4, 2013 situation report showed that AAR had only three SICs for the five S-61s listed.
Parties
- Appellant
- AAR Airlift Group, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- HTC71 l-10-D-R026
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- WEB LLC/WEBCONo. 63676September 23, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64235, 64236September 23, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64199August 4, 2026
- Weil Construction, Inc.No. 62742, 63155, 64045July 29, 2026
Same Year
- Club Car, Inc.No. 61710December 30, 2019
- Universal Service Provider, LLCNo. 62021December 23, 2019
- Technica CorporationNo. 62160December 20, 2019
- AXXON International, LLCNo. 61224, 61268, 61625December 20, 2019
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.No. 61618December 18, 2019
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- ACC Construction Co., Inc.No. 63528, 64067July 16, 2026
- Sayar Development Inc.No. 63871, 63894, 64191, 64227March 17, 2026
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979December 30, 2025
- Targe Logistic Services CompanyNo. 63282December 10, 2025