URS Federal Support Services, Inc.
URS Federal Support Services, Inc. appealed a deemed denial concerning a unilateral task-order modification that added five maintenance positions at Ft. Hood while reducing required positions at Ft. Knox and Kingsville. The Board held that the contract required the specified minimum team complement, denied the appeal as to the reductions, recognized entitlement to an equitable adjustment for the Ft. Hood change, rejected the Government's quantum calculation, and returned the matter for negotiation.
Material Facts
- Contract 0006 was an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract containing time-and-material, firm-fixed-price, and cost-reimbursement CLINs for Contract Field Team maintenance and related services.
- Task Order No. 0055 included firm-fixed-price aircraft maintenance labor requirements at Army Reserve aviation support facilities and used a team-complement table specifying personnel by skill and location.
- The FON prohibited offerors from proposing less than the minimum team complement, and the required firm-fixed-price complement totaled 99 personnel.
- The task order required firm-fixed-price maintenance support at Ft. Knox and Kingsville and identified Ft. Hood as a location where contract maintenance might be required.
- The Air Force proposed reducing three positions at Ft. Knox and two positions at Kingsville while adding five positions at Ft. Hood.
- URS disputed performing the additional Ft. Hood work without an adjustment to the firm-fixed-price amount.
- Modification No. 03 unilaterally revised the PWS to add Ft. Hood, reduce the Ft. Knox and Kingsville complements, and state that there was no change to the total amount obligated.
- URS's certified claim sought payment for base-period and option-year costs associated with the five positions directed by Modification No. 03.
- The Air Force conceded entitlement to a price increase for the Ft. Hood work but asserted an offsetting reduction for the personnel reductions at Ft. Knox and Kingsville.
- The record showed that URS generally performed satisfactory or better maintenance work despite staffing below the team-complement requirements at Ft. Knox and Kingsville.
- The Air Force's asserted reduction calculation used URS's proposal and pricing tables rather than URS's actual cost data.
- The Board returned the matter to the parties to negotiate the appropriate price for the change.
Parties
- Appellant
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- United States Department of the Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA8108-09-D-0006
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Metal Trades, Inc.No. 62966November 2, 2021
- Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.No. 62174October 19, 2021
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783August 5, 2021
- U.S. Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 62629August 5, 2021
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.No. 59998-QUANAugust 3, 2021
- G&S Carpet Mills, Inc.No. 62799June 25, 2021
Same Year
- Sweet Star Logistic ServiceNo. 62082December 29, 2020
- Nan, Inc.No. 61472, 61482, 61500, 61509, 61514, 61523, 61555, 61569, 61705, 61726, 61727, 61728, 61821, 61822, 61823, 61963December 18, 2020
- Asahi General Trading & Cont. Co. W.L.L.No. 62445December 18, 2020
- Kautaq Construction Services, LLCNo. 62462-ADRDecember 18, 2020
- MAC Electric Inc.No. 62503December 18, 2020
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 62112December 17, 2020
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026