CACI International, Inc. & CACI Technologies, Inc.
CACI International, Inc. and CACI Technologies, Inc. appealed a contracting officer's determination requiring repayment of danger-pay amounts calculated on employee salaries for extended overseas workweeks. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Board held that the employees' pay for their normal work hours constituted basic compensation and sustained the appeal.
Material Facts
- The contract was an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for support services, including overseas services, and the relevant portion was cost-reimbursable.
- The applicable performance work statement permitted, with contracting-officer approval, hazardous-duty compensation at rates set in accordance with State Department Guidelines.
- Task Order No. 0096 required a normal deployed workday of 12 hours per day, seven days per week, or 84 hours per week.
- Task Order No. 0127 required CACI employees to work 72 hours per week.
- CACI paid no overtime premium to employees working under Task Orders 0096 and 0127.
- CACI paid danger pay based on salaries reflecting the actual hours worked under the task orders and included those costs in its invoices.
- The contracting officer appeared to compensate CACI for the expense without objection until SIGAR challenged the calculation.
- SIGAR determined that the government had overpaid CACI for danger pay by $14,637 for Task Order 0096 and $25,095 for Task Order 0127.
Parties
- Appellant
- CACI International, Inc. & CACI Technologies, Inc.
- Contracting Agency
- the government
- Contract Number
- W15P7T-06-D-E402
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- KBR Services, LLCNo. 63870, 63956August 24, 2026
- AeroKool Aviation CorporationNo. 64377August 24, 2026
- Kropp Holdings, Inc.No. 64523August 24, 2026
- BFBC, LLCNo. 64509August 18, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.No. 64438July 30, 2026
Same Year
- Sparton DeLeon Springs, LLCNo. 60416December 28, 2016
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59873, 60885December 21, 2016
- Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, Inc.No. 59508, 59509December 20, 2016
- CDM Constructors, Inc.No. 59524December 20, 2016
- Astro Systems, Inc.No. 60769, 60781December 20, 2016
- First Division Design, LLCNo. 60884-975December 15, 2016
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026