Phoenix Hawk Construction Company
Phoenix Hawk Construction Company appealed a government motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction regarding a contract dispute. The Board denied the government's motion, allowing the appeal to proceed.
Material Facts
- The government awarded Contract No. W56JSL-12-P-2162 to the appellant on July 30, 2012.
- Modification No. P00003 terminated the contract in its entirety on February 9, 2013.
- The government emailed the appellant on March 9, 2014, requesting an invoice.
- The appellant responded with an email and an undated claim letter on March 9, 2014, claiming $91,734.00.
- The record includes a purported contracting officer's final decision dated April 3, 2014, stating the appellant was entitled to payment for 60 T-Walls.
- The contracting officer's final decision dated April 9, 2014, stated the appellant claimed payment for costs in the amount of AFN 6,114,300 ($109,183.93).
- The government sent the April 9, 2014 final decision to the appellant's email address but did not establish receipt.
- The appellant emailed the Board on January 10, 2017, stating a claim for T-Walls delivery under the contract.
Parties
- Appellant
- Phoenix Hawk Construction Company
- Respondent Agency
- CENTCOM-Joint Theater Support Contracting Command
- Contract Number
- W56JSL-12-P-2162
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Alderman Building Company, Inc.No. 58082May 21, 2020
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 61790December 18, 2019
- Arab Shah Construction CompanyNo. 61565November 4, 2019
- PIKA-Pirnie JV, LLCNo. 61597November 4, 2019
- Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc.No. 61535July 22, 2019
Same Year
- Club Car, Inc.No. 61710December 30, 2019
- Universal Service Provider, LLCNo. 62021December 23, 2019
- Technica CorporationNo. 62160December 20, 2019
- AXXON International, LLCNo. 61224, 61268, 61625December 20, 2019
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.No. 61618December 18, 2019
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026