Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc.
Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. appealed the termination of its supply contract for default. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment, denying the appeal.
Material Facts
- On March 25, 2016, the parties entered into fixed-price Contract No. SPE4A 7-l 6-C-0218 for the supply of 1,667 deployment sleeves at a total contractual amount of $221,962.
- The deployment sleeves were part of the T-11 Personal Parachute System used by the United States Army.
- BRSI was required to submit two deployment sleeves for a first article test (FAT).
- The government denied BRSI's request for a FAT waiver based on the lack of inspections on the deployment sleeves for almost two years.
- BRSI's initial FAT submission was rejected due to numerous major deficiencies.
- BRSI's resubmitted FAT samples were also found to contain major deficiencies and were rejected.
- The government issued a show cause notice to BRSI regarding the potential termination of the contract for default.
- BRSI's response to the show cause notice did not adequately address the deficiencies cited by the government.
- The CO terminated the contract for default on June 23, 2017, due to multiple first article test disapprovals.
Parties
- Appellant
- Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc.
- Contract Number
- SPE4A7-16-C-0218
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Ameresco Select, Inc.No. 59638, 60136, 60526July 11, 2022
- Hascon, LLCNo. 62352, 62353December 1, 2021
- Passaran Noori Construction CompanyNo. 62694July 29, 2021
- Intellicheck, Inc.No. 61709June 24, 2021
- General Dynamics - National Steel and Shipbuilding CompanyNo. 61854January 25, 2021
- Golden Build CompanyNo. 62294November 18, 2020
Same Year
- AT&T Corp.No. 61868December 21, 2018
- Gilbane Federal Joint VentureNo. 61590December 21, 2018
- WIT Associates, Inc.No. 61547December 19, 2018
- Avis Industries, Inc.No. 61609December 19, 2018
- Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc.No. 61209, 61210, 61211, 61212 61213, 61214December 19, 2018
- J.F. Brennan Co., Inc.No. 60737December 19, 2018
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026