61353

Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC

May 30, 2018Judge Clarke
OtherCDA JurisdictionQuantum / DamagesContract Changes / Constructive ChangesAuthority of Government AgentsDCAA Involved

The ASBCA held that Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC's certified claim stated a sum certain even though its claimed amount was based on estimated costs and profit. The Board further held that the Navy's desire for a DCAA audit did not render the appeal premature and concluded that it had jurisdiction.

Material Facts

  • On 13 December 2011, the Navy awarded Fluor Contract No. N69450-12-D-7582 for base operation services at four Navy installations in the Jacksonville, Florida, area.
  • The contract included a base year, four option years, and three award option years, with a firm-fixed-price line item and an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity line item for each contract year.
  • The Award-Option Plan required specified performance ratings for eligibility for an award option and authorized changes to assessment criteria subject to notice and, for a current performance period, bilateral modification.
  • Unilateral Modification No. P00187 revised the Award-Option Plan for available Award Option 3, and Modification No. P00193 exercised Award Option 3 for the period from 1 July 2017 through 30 June 2018.
  • Fluor objected to Modification Nos. P00187 and P00193 and submitted a certified claim asserting entitlement to allowable costs of performing Award Option 3 plus reasonable profit.
  • The claim's calculation used Fluor's costs during Option Year 4 to estimate the costs of performing Award Option 3.
  • The Navy stated that the claim would require a DCAA audit and other independent analysis before a final decision.
  • Fluor appealed based on a deemed denial of its claim.

Parties

Appellant
Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC
Respondent Agency
Navy
Contracting Agency
Navy
Contract Number
N69450-12-D-7582
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.