Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC
Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC challenged the Navy's unilateral modification of an Award-Option Plan and unilateral exercise of Award Option 3. On Fluor's motion for summary judgment, the Board held that the modifications were unauthorized and unenforceable, sustained the appeal, and remanded the case to determine quantum.
Material Facts
- The Navy awarded Fluor a contract for base operation services at four Navy installations in the Jacksonville, Florida, area.
- The contract included a base year, four option years, and three award option years, with firm-fixed-price and indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity line items.
- The contract included FAR 52.243-1, FAR 52.217-8, FAC 5252.217-9301, a Period of Performance clause, and an Award-Option Plan.
- The Award-Option Plan required a Very Good or Exceptional end-of-period performance rating to be eligible for an award-option period.
- The Navy rated Fluor's performance Marginal after option year 2 and Satisfactory after option year 3, and deleted award option years 1 and 2.
- Modification No. P00187 changed the Award-Option Plan to permit a future 12-month award option based on a Satisfactory rating for the convenience of the Agency.
- Modification No. P00193 exercised Award Option 3 for a 12-month period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018.
- The Award-Option Plan required the ODO to document the rationale for changes to the AOB's recommended rating.
- The Navy stated that Fluor's certified claim required a DCAA audit and other independent analyses.
- Fluor appealed to the Board based on a deemed denial of its certified claim.
Parties
- Appellant
- Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- Navy
- Contracting Agency
- Navy
- Contract Number
- N69450-12-D-7582
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Metal Trades, Inc.No. 62966November 2, 2021
- Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.No. 62174October 19, 2021
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783August 5, 2021
- U.S. Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 62629August 5, 2021
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.No. 59998-QUANAugust 3, 2021
- G&S Carpet Mills, Inc.No. 62799June 25, 2021
Same Year
- Club Car, Inc.No. 61710December 30, 2019
- Universal Service Provider, LLCNo. 62021December 23, 2019
- Technica CorporationNo. 62160December 20, 2019
- AXXON International, LLCNo. 61224, 61268, 61625December 20, 2019
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.No. 61618December 18, 2019
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026