61468

Superior Construction Company

July 1, 2020Judge Woodrow
Denied / Government PrevailedStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

Superior Construction Company appealed a denial of mobilization costs related to a suspended contract in Afghanistan. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment, ruling the claim was untimely.

Material Facts

  • The government awarded Contract No. H92237-11-C-0701 to Superior Construction Company on May 11, 2011.
  • SCC mobilized machinery and labor for the project but was informed that work could not begin due to another ongoing project.
  • SCC and the government exchanged emails regarding compensation for mobilization costs from July 18, 2011, until September 23, 2011.
  • SCC filed an appeal with the Board on August 8, 2017, but had not submitted a claim to the contracting officer prior to this.
  • SCC submitted a claim for $40,900 on September 20, 2017, describing costs related to mobilization.
  • The contracting officer issued a final decision denying the claim on December 28, 2017, based on the statute of limitations.
  • The government filed a motion for summary judgment on June 4, 2018, asserting the claim was outside the six-year period.

Parties

Appellant
Superior Construction Company
Respondent Agency
Department of the Air Force
Contract Number
Contract No. H92237-11-C-0701
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.