Superior Construction Company
Superior Construction Company appealed a denial of mobilization costs related to a suspended contract in Afghanistan. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment, ruling the claim was untimely.
Material Facts
- The government awarded Contract No. H92237-11-C-0701 to Superior Construction Company on May 11, 2011.
- SCC mobilized machinery and labor for the project but was informed that work could not begin due to another ongoing project.
- SCC and the government exchanged emails regarding compensation for mobilization costs from July 18, 2011, until September 23, 2011.
- SCC filed an appeal with the Board on August 8, 2017, but had not submitted a claim to the contracting officer prior to this.
- SCC submitted a claim for $40,900 on September 20, 2017, describing costs related to mobilization.
- The contracting officer issued a final decision denying the claim on December 28, 2017, based on the statute of limitations.
- The government filed a motion for summary judgment on June 4, 2018, asserting the claim was outside the six-year period.
Parties
- Appellant
- Superior Construction Company
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Air Force
- Contract Number
- Contract No. H92237-11-C-0701
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Arctic Swan Construction Inc.No. 64085September 22, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Jaxon Construction, Inc.No. 64432June 24, 2026
- Arctic Swan Construction Inc.No. 63510, 64085June 16, 2026
- Eleven Bravo Group, LLCNo. 63932April 8, 2026
- Penna Group, LLCNo. 61708-ADR, 61641-ADR, 61642-ADRFebruary 20, 2026
Same Year
- Sweet Star Logistic ServiceNo. 62082December 29, 2020
- Nan, Inc.No. 61472, 61482, 61500, 61509, 61514, 61523, 61555, 61569, 61705, 61726, 61727, 61728, 61821, 61822, 61823, 61963December 18, 2020
- Asahi General Trading & Cont. Co. W.L.L.No. 62445December 18, 2020
- Kautaq Construction Services, LLCNo. 62462-ADRDecember 18, 2020
- MAC Electric Inc.No. 62503December 18, 2020
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 62112December 17, 2020
Same Issue
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026
- Watts Constructors, LLCNo. 63753September 25, 2025
- Sayar Development Inc.No. 63871, 63894, 64191, 64227August 6, 2025
- US Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 63957August 6, 2025
- CACI International Inc.No. 63663May 6, 2025