Arctic Swan Construction Inc.
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ruled on the government's Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Arctic Swan Construction Inc.'s claim for additional compensation under a fixed-price contract for appliance installation at Eielson Air Force Base, concluding that the contract required installation as part of the base price.
Material Facts
- The government issued Solicitation No. FA500421B0004 on July 15, 2021, for drayage and furnishing management services.
- Contract No. FA500422C0002 was awarded to Arctic Swan Construction Inc.
- The PWS included explicit directives for the handling, delivery, and installation of appliances, including washers and dryers.
- The bid schedules required the contractor to provide a single, fully burdened unit price for each washer or dryer handled.
- Arctic Swan did not submit any Requests for Information regarding the pricing structure before bidding.
- The contracting officer issued a final decision on September 15, 2022, referencing a claim amount of $685,200 and denying it.
- Arctic Swan submitted a properly certified claim on November 7, 2024, for $334,213, which was also denied by the contracting officer.
- The Board determined that the contract required the installation and connection of washers and dryers at the unit prices established in the contract.
Parties
- Appellant
- Arctic Swan Construction Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- Contract No. FA5004-22-C-0002
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Arctic Swan Construction Inc.No. 64085September 22, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Jaxon Construction, Inc.No. 64432June 24, 2026
- Eleven Bravo Group, LLCNo. 63932April 8, 2026
- Penna Group, LLCNo. 61708-ADR, 61641-ADR, 61642-ADRFebruary 20, 2026
- InfiniSource Consulting Solutions, Inc.No. 64354, 64355February 19, 2026
Same Year
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026