Arctic Swan Construction Inc.
Arctic Swan Construction Inc. sought reconsideration of the Board’s prior decision granting the government’s motion for summary judgment and denying the appeal. The Board denied reconsideration, holding that Arctic Swan identified neither newly discovered evidence, a mistaken factual finding, nor an error of law, and that the prior contract-interpretation ruling was properly resolved on summary judgment.
Material Facts
- The appeal arose under Contract No. FA5004-22-C-0002.
- The relevant contract documents included the Performance Work Statement and bid schedule.
- The pricing workbook required Arctic Swan to provide a single unit price for each washer and dryer.
- The pricing workbook did not contain separate lines for labor, certification, connection, or disconnection.
- The Performance Work Statement expressly required installation-related work.
- Arctic Swan relied on post-award communications and the parties’ course of performance.
- Arctic Swan did not contend that it sought clarification before submitting its bid.
Parties
- Appellant
- Arctic Swan Construction Inc.
- Contract Number
- FA5004-22-C-0002
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Jaxon Construction, Inc.No. 64432June 24, 2026
- Arctic Swan Construction Inc.No. 63510, 64085June 16, 2026
- Eleven Bravo Group, LLCNo. 63932April 8, 2026
- Penna Group, LLCNo. 61708-ADR, 61641-ADR, 61642-ADRFebruary 20, 2026
- InfiniSource Consulting Solutions, Inc.No. 64354, 64355February 19, 2026
Same Year
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- WEB LLC/WEBCONo. 63676September 23, 2026
- Environet, Inc.No. 64167September 23, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64235, 64236September 23, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
Same Issue
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026