Vectrus Systems Corporation
Vectrus Systems Corporation appealed a contracting officer’s denial of a certified claim concerning a contract price adjustment for receiving and processing non-supply line-item materials for disposition through DRMO/DLADS. After the contracting officer withdrew the prior final decision and agreed that Vectrus was entitled to an adjustment, the Board denied the parties’ joint request for an entitlement order and dismissed the appeal as moot, leaving quantum for later resolution.
Material Facts
- Vectrus appealed a contracting officer’s decision denying its certified claim.
- The claim sought a price adjustment based on the government’s alleged change requiring Vectrus to receive and process non-supply line-item materials for disposition through DRMO/DLADS.
- The contracting officer later withdrew the prior final decision in its entirety.
- The government agreed that Vectrus was entitled to a contract-price adjustment in accordance with its interpretation of the contract.
- The government invited Vectrus to submit a revised certified proposal supporting the claimed amount and intended to issue a final decision on quantum.
- The record contained no evidence that the withdrawal was taken in bad faith.
- The parties agreed that any quantum issue would be handled after entitlement was resolved.
Parties
- Appellant
- Vectrus Systems Corporation
- Contract Number
- FA3002-17-C-0009
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Left Hand Design CorporationNo. 62458November 7, 2024
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 63465May 22, 2024
- MECTS Services Joint VentureNo. 63441July 19, 2023
- Derian, Inc.No. 63283February 1, 2023
- Mills Design Group Construction and DevelopmentNo. 62432February 1, 2023
- KiewitPhelpsNo. 61184December 30, 2022
Same Year
- Central Environmental, Inc.No. 62628December 28, 2023
- Horizon Environmental Services, Inc.No. 63428, 63463December 28, 2023
- O-Tech Solutions, LLCNo. 61898-EAJA, 62095-EAJADecember 26, 2023
- PAE Applied Technologies LLCNo. 63233December 26, 2023
- G-W Management Services, LLCNo. 63318December 26, 2023
- SOC LLCNo. 63660December 22, 2023
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026