61755

Moonschein Industries LLC

September 11, 2019Judge Cates-Harman
DismissedTermination for DefaultTermination for Convenience

Moonschein Industries LLC appealed a contracting officer's final decision terminating their contract for default. The Board dismissed the appeal as moot after the government converted the termination to one for convenience.

Material Facts

  • The Contracting Officer awarded Contract No. W9124G-18-R-0004 on July 2, 2018, to Moonschein Industries LLC in the amount of $1,166,366.00 for grounds maintenance services on Fort Rucker, Alabama.
  • Performance bonds were required under the terms of the contract in an amount equal to 100 percent of the original contract price.
  • The contract incorporated by reference the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 52.212-4, which allowed the government to terminate the contract for cause in the event of any default.
  • On August 14, 2018, the contracting officer terminated the contract for cause citing the appellant's failure to provide the required performance and payment bonds.
  • A notice of appeal of the contracting officer's termination for default was filed with the Board on August 17, 2018.
  • On December 17, 2018, the contracting officer signed bilateral Modification No. 4 converting the termination for cause to a termination for convenience and adding the sum of $3,722.59 to the contract for payment and invoice purposes.

Parties

Appellant
Moonschein Industries LLC
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W9124G-18-C-0004
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.