61950

DynCorp International LLC

September 29, 2020Judge Clarke
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostContract InterpretationDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

DynCorp International LLC appealed the disallowance of severance payments to its former CEO included in incurred-cost proposals for cost reimbursement contracts. The Board held that the severance payments were not compensation subject to the statutory compensation cap, but that the portion derived from salary and bonus amounts exceeding the caps was unreasonable and therefore unallowable, and denied the appeal as to the government's right to deductions.

Material Facts

  • DynCorp and the government were parties to numerous cost reimbursement contracts administered by DCMA, including Contract No. W52P1J-07-D-0007.
  • Steven F. Gaffney served as DynCorp's CEO from August 25, 2010, until his employment was terminated on July 10, 2014.
  • The 2010 Employment Agreement and 2014 Separation Agreement required DynCorp to pay severance following Gaffney's termination.
  • The employment agreement provided for a base salary of $2,000,000 and a target bonus equal to 130 percent of base salary.
  • DynCorp included severance costs in its 2015 and 2016 incurred cost proposals within its G&A expense pool.
  • DCAA audited DynCorp's proposed amounts on unsettled flexibly priced contracts for calendar years 2015 and 2016 and questioned indirect severance costs based on reasonableness.
  • The statutory compensation cap ranged from $693,951 in 2010 to $1,144,888 in 2014.
  • DynCorp calculated the severance payments as two times the sum of base salary and bonus.
  • DCMA's Contracting Officer's Final Decision disallowed amounts from DynCorp's 2015 and 2016 G&A pools and unilaterally established final indirect cost rates for those years.

Parties

Appellant
DynCorp International LLC
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
W52P1J-07-D-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.