Northrop Grumman Corporation
Northrop Grumman Corporation challenged the disallowance of portions of its FY 2012 pay-as-you-go, nonqualified defined-benefit pension costs derived from compensation exceeding the FAR 31.205-6(p) cap. On cross-motions for partial summary judgment, the Board denied Northrop Grumman's motion and granted the government's cross-motion, holding that the challenged pension costs were unallowable directly associated costs and, alternatively, unreasonable costs.
Material Facts
- Northrop Grumman performed flexibly-priced contracts containing FAR 52.216-7.
- Northrop Grumman accounted for the relevant nonqualified defined-benefit pension plans on a pay-as-you-go basis.
- The pension plans provided supplemental retirement benefits to selected executives and other key or highly compensated employees.
- The pension formulas used final average earnings or annual compensation as a factor in calculating retirement benefits.
- The compensation factors included salary and bonus amounts exceeding the applicable FAR 31.205-6(p) limitation in effect when the participants earned the compensation.
- Northrop Grumman's FY 2012 Incurred Cost Submission included pension costs incurred under the identified pension plans.
- DCAA issued a September 29, 2017, audit report questioning portions of the proposed pension costs as directly associated with expressly unallowable costs under FAR 31.205-6(p).
- The DCMA CACO's final decision disallowed portions of Northrop Grumman's FY 2012 pension costs and assessed no penalties.
- The parties stipulated that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact.
Parties
- Appellant
- Northrop Grumman Corporation
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contracting Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contract Number
- F33657-01-C-4600
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026
- J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.No. 63378, 64226, 64439July 28, 2026
- TYD ServicesNo. 64429, 64430July 8, 2026
- Granite Construction CompanyNo. 63667June 23, 2026
- J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.No. 63378, 64226, 64439June 2, 2026
- Malika and Refa Environmental SolutionsNo. 63960December 8, 2025
Same Year
- Central Environmental, Inc.No. 62628December 28, 2023
- Horizon Environmental Services, Inc.No. 63428, 63463December 28, 2023
- O-Tech Solutions, LLCNo. 61898-EAJA, 62095-EAJADecember 26, 2023
- PAE Applied Technologies LLCNo. 63233December 26, 2023
- G-W Management Services, LLCNo. 63318December 26, 2023
- SOC LLCNo. 63660December 22, 2023
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.No. 62638, 63879May 6, 2026
- CACI International, Inc.No. 63663March 10, 2026