Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company sought partial summary judgment on the government's affirmative defense of laches in an appeal involving a certified claim for alleged cumulative impacts from over-and-above work on a fixed-price aircraft-upgrade program. The Board granted the motion, holding that laches was unavailable against the CDA claim because Congress had enacted a six-year statute of limitations.
Material Facts
- The Air Force awarded Contract No. FA8625-07-C-6471 to Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company for the Reliability Enhancement and ReEngining Program.
- The contract required upgrades to specified C-5 Galaxy aircraft, including installation of new CF6-80C2 commercial engines and other enhancements to subsystems and major components.
- The work was performed under mostly fixed-price contract line items.
- The contractor's claim alleged that excessive over-and-above work changes resulted in an additional constructive change and cumulative impacts to the fixed-price efforts.
- The contractor calculated production hours attributable to the cumulative disruptive impacts of over-and-above changes in pricing its claim.
- The government asserted laches as an affirmative defense in its answer.
- The government argued that delay in asserting the cumulative-impact claims prejudiced its ability to defend against numerous Manufacturing Deficiency Reports and hours of over-and-above work.
Parties
- Appellant
- Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
- Respondent Agency
- Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA8625-07-C-6471
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Patriot Construction, LLCNo. 63087-ADR, 63205-ADRMay 15, 2025
- Red River Science & Technology, LLCNo. 63785April 22, 2025
- Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, LLCNo. 62716, 62717February 19, 2025
- Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCINo. 63639June 24, 2024
- Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCINo. 63563June 24, 2024
- AVMAC LLCNo. 63747-ADRMay 24, 2024
Same Year
- Cellular Materials International, Inc.No. 61408December 27, 2021
- Meltech Corporation, Inc.No. 61706, 61768December 17, 2021
- Telos CorporationNo. 62950December 16, 2021
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Adjuvant/Capital, LLCNo. 62760December 13, 2021
- Veteran Facility Services, LLCNo. 61855, 61983, 62386December 9, 2021
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- DCS CorporationNo. 64648September 22, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026