62209

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

June 22, 2021Judge Page
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedQuantum / DamagesContract Changes / Constructive ChangesDelay / Disruption / SuspensionStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company sought partial summary judgment on the government's affirmative defense of laches in an appeal involving a certified claim for alleged cumulative impacts from over-and-above work on a fixed-price aircraft-upgrade program. The Board granted the motion, holding that laches was unavailable against the CDA claim because Congress had enacted a six-year statute of limitations.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded Contract No. FA8625-07-C-6471 to Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company for the Reliability Enhancement and ReEngining Program.
  • The contract required upgrades to specified C-5 Galaxy aircraft, including installation of new CF6-80C2 commercial engines and other enhancements to subsystems and major components.
  • The work was performed under mostly fixed-price contract line items.
  • The contractor's claim alleged that excessive over-and-above work changes resulted in an additional constructive change and cumulative impacts to the fixed-price efforts.
  • The contractor calculated production hours attributable to the cumulative disruptive impacts of over-and-above changes in pricing its claim.
  • The government asserted laches as an affirmative defense in its answer.
  • The government argued that delay in asserting the cumulative-impact claims prejudiced its ability to defend against numerous Manufacturing Deficiency Reports and hours of over-and-above work.

Parties

Appellant
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
FA8625-07-C-6471
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.