62209

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

April 13, 2022Judge Page
Partially SustainedCDA JurisdictionStatute of Limitations / TimelinessAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverContract Changes / Constructive ChangesEquitable Adjustment (REA)Delay / Disruption / SuspensionQuantum / DamagesDCMA Involved

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company sought recovery for alleged cumulative impacts of over-and-above work under a C-5 modernization contract. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Board denied the government's timeliness motion, denied Lockheed Martin's first cross-motion, granted its second and third cross-motions, and held the claim timely to the extent based on MDRs approved on or after October 15, 2012.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded Lockheed Martin Contract No. FA8625-07-C-6471 for upgrades to 49 government-owned C-5 Galaxy aircraft.
  • The contract used mostly fixed-price CLINs for RERP modernization work and included additional O&A work under T&M and later CPFF CLINs.
  • The H106 clause required Lockheed Martin to submit work requests for legacy discrepancies and required an equitable adjustment when R3 activity affected cost or schedule.
  • Lockheed Martin could not determine the extent of needed legacy repairs before aircraft induction, and additional conditions were discovered as aircraft were opened, inspected, and tested.
  • The government approved O&A work after the need was identified during inspections, test phases, and contract performance.
  • Modification No. P00178 contained a release concerning C-5 RERP production schedule impacts through November 6, 2012.
  • Lockheed Martin's claim alleged that excessive O&A work caused a constructive change and cumulative disruptive impacts to the fixed-price RERP effort.
  • Lockheed Martin's claim used a measured-mile analysis comparing an impacted production period with an unimpacted production period.
  • The government declined to issue a final decision on the October 15, 2018 claim.
  • The government relied on a February 24, 2011 letter and September 2012 delay and disruption meetings to argue that Lockheed Martin knew or should have known the basis of its claim before October 15, 2012.
  • The record presented differing evidence concerning whether pre-October 15, 2012 O&A hours included support and production hours while the claim used production hours only.
  • The claim included impacts associated with MDRs that took place or were approved after Modification No. P00178.

Parties

Appellant
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
FA8625-07-C-6471
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.