62209

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

August 3, 2022Judge Page
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedContract Changes / Constructive ChangesDelay / Disruption / SuspensionQuantum / DamagesContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverCDA JurisdictionDCMA Involved

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company sought an equitable adjustment for alleged disruption to fixed-price aircraft-modification work caused by excessive over-and-above repairs, overzealous inspection, and cumulative impacts. On the parties’ second set of cross-motions for summary judgment, the Board denied the government’s motions and granted Lockheed Martin’s two cross-motions concerning the measured-mile method, entitlement issues, jurisdiction over its implied-duty claim, and release defenses, while leaving the merits of the claim for further proceedings.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force awarded Lockheed Martin Contract No. FA8625-07-C-6471 to upgrade 49 government-owned C-5 Galaxy aircraft.
  • The contract work was performed under mostly fixed-price contract line items.
  • Over-and-above repair work was performed on a time-and-materials basis until April 28, 2013, and thereafter on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis pursuant to Modification P00182.
  • The appeal concerns aircraft P-7 through P-27, which were part of Lots 3, 4, and 5.
  • The statement of work provided that work required to bring an aircraft to flightworthiness beyond the contract scope would be accomplished under the rapid-repair clause or another mutually agreeable contractual arrangement.
  • The H106 clause provided for an equitable adjustment when rapid-repair activity increased or decreased the cost or time required for performance.
  • The contract modifications at issue contained releases concerning claims or equitable adjustments arising out of or in connection with the changes effected by the modifications.
  • Modification P00301 concerned Lot 6 rapid-repair work, revised H106 and H139 procedures, and funding for CLINs 6019 and 6020; it did not establish manufacturing deficiency report limits for Lots 3, 4, or 5.
  • Lockheed Martin alleged that excessive over-and-above work and government inspection practices disrupted the fixed-price modernization work.
  • Lockheed Martin’s claim used a measured-mile analysis comparing an impacted production period with an unimpacted production period.
  • The contracting officer declined to issue a final decision on Lockheed Martin’s certified claim.

Parties

Appellant
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
FA8625-07-C-6471
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.