62221

Metro Machine dba General Dynamics NASSCO-Norfolk

June 9, 2020Judge Clarke
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedCDA JurisdictionLiquidated DamagesEquitable Adjustment (REA)Delay / Disruption / Suspension

The Navy challenged the Board’s jurisdiction over a pass-through claim because the certification was signed by the subcontractor’s president rather than an authorized officer of the prime contractor. The Board held that the certification was defective but not absent, permitted correction before a merits decision, and denied the Navy’s motion.

Material Facts

  • The Navy awarded NASSCO Task Order No. N00024-16-D-4408-0006 under Contract No. N00024-16-D-4408 to perform repairs on the USS Bulkeley.
  • NASSCO awarded Purchase Order No. SL302379 to Advanced Integrated Technologies for repair services, including boat handling equipment repair.
  • The Navy informed NASSCO that the boat handling repairs had not been timely completed and that the equipment remained inoperable.
  • NASSCO and AIT entered into a Claim And Appeal Sponsorship Agreement incorporating NASSCO-Norfolk’s Military Ship Repair Programs General Terms and Conditions.
  • The agreement provided that AIT would submit a written and certified claim or request for equitable adjustment concerning remission of the assessed liquidated damages and a time extension for Government-caused excusable delay.
  • The agreement provided that NASSCO would review the sponsored claim and, in its sole discretion, submit it as a pass-through claim to the Contracting Officer.
  • The subcontract terms provided that NASSCO could submit AIT’s claim to the Government in its sole discretion and conditioned an appeal using NASSCO’s name on protection of NASSCO’s independent rights or NASSCO’s written consent.
  • AIT’s president, Carlton Spraberry, signed the claim certification submitted by NASSCO to the Navy.
  • NASSCO’s Director of Contracts signed the transmittal letter sending the certification to the Navy.

Parties

Appellant
Metro Machine dba General Dynamics NASSCO-Norfolk
Respondent Agency
Navy
Contracting Agency
Navy
Contract Number
N00024-16-D-4408
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.