DynCorp International, LLC
DynCorp International, LLC challenged two marginal CPARS ratings issued by the United States Air Force Materiel Command and sought correction of the evaluation. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss as moot after the contracting officer withdrew the entire evaluation for review and denied DynCorp's motion to suspend proceedings.
Material Facts
- DynCorp challenged a Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System evaluation issued as part of an evaluation by the United States Air Force Materiel Command.
- DynCorp sought correction of two marginal CPARS ratings.
- DynCorp claimed that the ratings were inaccurate and unfair.
- The contracting officer withdrew the entire CPARS evaluation for review and to make any appropriate changes.
- The government stated that the review would take DynCorp's contentions into account.
- DynCorp supported the government's withdrawal and intended review of the evaluation.
- DynCorp expressed concern that a future set of marginal ratings could influence agency past performance reviews.
Parties
- Appellant
- DynCorp International, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- United States Air Force Materiel Command
- Contracting Agency
- United States Air Force Materiel Command
- Contract Number
- FA8617-17-C-6210
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- HECO Pacific Manufacturing, Inc.No. 63217, 64512September 1, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- ACC Construction Co., Inc.No. 63528, 64067July 16, 2026
- Gibraltar-Caddell, a Joint VentureNo. 64379July 13, 2026
- Akima Range Readiness Operations, LLCNo. 64012-ADRJune 4, 2026
- Envistacom, LLCNo. 63796May 13, 2026
Same Year
- Sweet Star Logistic ServiceNo. 62082December 29, 2020
- Nan, Inc.No. 61472, 61482, 61500, 61509, 61514, 61523, 61555, 61569, 61705, 61726, 61727, 61728, 61821, 61822, 61823, 61963December 18, 2020
- Asahi General Trading & Cont. Co. W.L.L.No. 62445December 18, 2020
- Kautaq Construction Services, LLCNo. 62462-ADRDecember 18, 2020
- MAC Electric Inc.No. 62503December 18, 2020
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 62112December 17, 2020
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026