Vox Optima, LLC
Vox Optima, LLC appealed the Navy's decision to exclude its proposal from the competitive range on a task order, which the Board dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a claim submitted to the contracting officer.
Material Facts
- The Navy awarded Vox Optima, LLC an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract on January 2, 2019.
- The contract contained a maximum pass-through rate of 8% on subcontractors.
- Appellant submitted a proposal by the April 23, 2019 deadline with a pass-through rate of 8.15%, which was higher than the maximum.
- The higher rate was attributed to a clerical error and rounding conventions in the government spreadsheet.
- The contracting officer excluded appellant from the competitive range on December 2, 2019, due to the pass-through rate being a material nonconformance.
- Appellant submitted a corrected pass-through rate later that day, but the contracting officer declined to change his decision.
- On December 17, 2019, appellant submitted a document labeled as a 'CLAIM FOR PROPOSAL COSTS' to the Board, requesting reimbursement of $56,961.09.
- Appellant's counsel confirmed on April 14, 2020, that it had not submitted a claim to the contracting officer.
Parties
- Appellant
- Vox Optima, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- Navy
- Contract Number
- N00178-19-D-8818
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Korte Construction CompanyNo. 63539, 63540September 30, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63627, 63647, 63656, 63657, 63658June 10, 2026
- J. Star Enterprises, Inc.No. 63603June 9, 2026
- Vectrus Systems CorporationNo. 63420May 11, 2026
Same Year
- Sweet Star Logistic ServiceNo. 62082December 29, 2020
- Nan, Inc.No. 61472, 61482, 61500, 61509, 61514, 61523, 61555, 61569, 61705, 61726, 61727, 61728, 61821, 61822, 61823, 61963December 18, 2020
- Asahi General Trading & Cont. Co. W.L.L.No. 62445December 18, 2020
- Kautaq Construction Services, LLCNo. 62462-ADRDecember 18, 2020
- MAC Electric Inc.No. 62503December 18, 2020
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 62112December 17, 2020
Same Issue
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- The Haskell CompanyNo. 64380, 64381May 5, 2026
- Futures, Inc.No. 61566April 16, 2026
- Endure Industries, Inc.No. 64064March 23, 2026
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64309March 2, 2026