63420

Vectrus Systems Corporation

May 11, 2026Judge O'Connell
Denied / Government PrevailedOther

Vectrus Systems Corporation appealed the denial of a certified claim alleging that the Air Force negligently estimated workload for a firm-fixed-price base operating services contract at Sheppard Air Force Base. The Board denied the appeal, holding that Vectrus did not prove that the workload estimates were negligently prepared or that the workload increased compared to the solicitation.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force solicited base operating services at Sheppard Air Force Base under a contract that included firm-fixed-price contract line items.
  • The solicitation provided historical workload data for fiscal years 2013, 2014, and 2015 and referred bidders to a Technical Library containing fiscal year 2016 workload data.
  • The contract incorporated the Technical Library.
  • The solicitation and Technical Library described the buildings, components, equipment, preventative-maintenance tasks, and anticipated task durations.
  • Vectrus cited its prior experience at Maxwell Air Force Base, where it represented that its enhanced preventative-maintenance program increased preventative-maintenance work and reduced repair work orders.
  • Vectrus did not contend that the overall workload or the workload in individual cost centers increased; it analyzed work orders by cost center and priority level.
  • Vectrus excluded fiscal year 2016 data from its claim methodology and sought additional compensation when option-year work orders exceeded a fiscal year 2013 through fiscal year 2015 average by more than ten percent.
  • Total work orders and total work hours for all cost centers declined in both option years compared to the fiscal year 2013 through fiscal year 2015 averages.
  • Under Vectrus, Urgent Structures work orders dropped sharply while Routine Structures work orders increased by more than 3,000 per year compared to fiscal year 2013 through fiscal year 2016.
  • Vectrus performed plumbing and work previously included in SMART under other cost centers, including Structures.
  • Vectrus’s preventative-maintenance work increased while repair work decreased in the cost centers discussed by the Board.

Parties

Appellant
Vectrus Systems Corporation
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
FA3002-18-C-0003
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.