AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. appealed the denial of its claim for proposal development costs incurred after the government canceled an ESPC project and did not issue a task order. The Board denied the appeal, holding that the contract placed the proposal-development risk on AECOM, that the superior-knowledge theory was outside the Board's jurisdiction, and that other theories were waived or unavailable.
Material Facts
- The government awarded AECOM an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Multiple Award Task Order Contract for energy savings projects.
- The contract stated that preliminary-assessment costs could be recovered through an eventual task-order award or through the government's option to obtain ownership of submitted documentation.
- The contract stated that the government would not be liable for feasibility-study costs if the project was determined not feasible unless the government exercised its option to obtain ownership of the submitted documentation.
- The government selected AECOM as the Energy Savings Performance Contractor for the Buckley Air Force Base project.
- The government authorized AECOM to proceed with preliminary-assessment, feasibility-study, design, and price-proposal work.
- The contracting officer informed AECOM that the government would not pursue the project and did not plan to exercise the option to obtain ownership of submitted documentation.
- The government did not issue a task order to AECOM for the project.
- AECOM submitted a certified claim for costs incurred in developing and designing the project.
- The contracting officer denied the claim.
- AECOM filed a five-count complaint and appealed the contracting officer's decision.
Parties
- Appellant
- AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntsville
- Contracting Agency
- U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntsville
- Contract Number
- W912DY-15-D-0040
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- WEB LLC/WEBCONo. 63676September 23, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64235, 64236September 23, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64199August 4, 2026
- Weil Construction, Inc.No. 62742, 63155, 64045July 29, 2026
Same Year
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979December 30, 2025
- Kallidus TechnologiesNo. 61377, 61976December 18, 2025
- Warfighter Defense, Inc.No. 63908, 63909December 11, 2025
- Targe Logistic Services CompanyNo. 63282December 10, 2025
- K2 Solutions, Inc.No. 62768December 9, 2025
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64307December 8, 2025
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026