63233

PAE Applied Technologies LLC

August 24, 2023Judge Taylor
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)CDA JurisdictionDCAA Involved

The Board denied the Navy's motion to dismiss PAE Applied Technologies LLC's appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It held that the Navy's March 2, 2022, demand letter concerning allegedly unallowable COVID-related costs was a valid government claim and contracting officer's final decision under the CDA.

Material Facts

  • PAE and the Navy executed a cost reimbursement Contract No. N66604-05-C-1277 for maintenance and operations at the Atlantic Undersea Test & Evaluation Center.
  • The contract incorporated FAR 52.216-7, ALLOWABLE COST AND PAYMENT (DEC 2002) and FAR 52.233-1, DISPUTES (JUL 2002).
  • Beginning in March 2021, the Navy and PAE exchanged correspondence concerning the applicability of the CARES Act, fees charged on COVID-related costs, and the allowability of those costs.
  • The contracting officer's March 2, 2022, letter was entitled “DEMAND FOR PAYMENT FOR UNALLOWABLE COVID COSTS.”
  • The letter stated that the government had determined that PAE invoiced, and the government paid, unallowable COVID costs on the contract.
  • The letter included a breakdown of the alleged unallowable COVID charges paid to date by contract price line item and sub-line item.
  • The letter advised that interest would accrue on amounts not paid within 30 days and that the payment office could initiate offset procedures.
  • The contracting officer stated that she issued the demand letter to “break the stalemate that had arisen between me and PAE about the backup for its COVID-19 costs.”
  • The contracting officer later withdrew the demand letter but stated that she still intended to pursue the Navy's questions about the costs and had initiated an audit with the Defense Contract Audit Agency.
  • PAE timely appealed the demand letter to the Board.

Parties

Appellant
PAE Applied Technologies LLC
Respondent Agency
United States Department of the Navy
Contracting Agency
United States Department of the Navy
Contract Number
N66604-05-C-1277
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.