Lift Up Trucking, LLC
Lift Up Trucking, LLC appealed the denial of its claims regarding a tick infestation and payment for work performed under a contract with the Army. The Board dismissed two claims for lack of jurisdiction and denied the claim for unpaid work due to nonconformance.
Material Facts
- The Army awarded a contract to Lift Up Trucking for grounds maintenance and snow/ice removal on December 30, 2024.
- The contract required removal of weeds and was signed by Lift Up Trucking's CEO.
- The government agreed to pay Lift Up Trucking $11,000 for the services for the base period.
- Lift Up Trucking submitted three invoices for work performed, all of which were paid by the government.
- On June 23, 2025, Lift Up Trucking submitted a fourth invoice for $2,316.67 for summer grounds maintenance.
- The Army's contracting officer representative notified Lift Up Trucking that the grounds maintenance was incomplete due to remaining weeds.
- Lift Up Trucking claimed unsafe worksite conditions due to a tick infestation and paused work until the issue was addressed.
- The contracting officer issued a final decision denying the claim, stating there was no evidence of a tick infestation and that Lift Up Trucking failed to provide conforming services.
Parties
- Appellant
- Lift Up Trucking, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- United States Army
- Contract Number
- W912CH-25-P-L009
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Targe Logistic Services CompanyNo. 63282December 10, 2025
- Jabez-Absher Small Business Joint VentureNo. 63898October 2, 2025
- Fidelity & Deposit Company of MarylandNo. 63278August 13, 2025
- Michael M. Tsontos, S.A.No. 63595-EAJAJuly 11, 2025
- CKY, INC.No. 60451-EAJAJune 20, 2025
- A4 Construction Company, IncNo. 63252, 63456, 63626, 63961May 16, 2025
Same Year
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- DCS CorporationNo. 64648September 22, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026