Vectrus Systems Corporation
Vectrus Systems Corporation sought an equitable adjustment under a fixed-price laundry-services contract based on laundry volumes exceeding selected figures in revised workload data. The Board held that the workload data imposed no contractual limits and denied the appeal.
Material Facts
- The USAF issued Base Operation Support Services Contract No. FA3002-17-C-0001 for services at Keesler Air Force Base.
- The contract included four laundry-service provisions with corresponding CLINs that were firm fixed price per month, multiplied by 12 months per contract year.
- The laundry CLINs did not specify a number, range, or limit of items to be serviced.
- Appendix 15B contained workload data listing 34 individual item-types and a total for each one.
- The contract did not define the workload data's contractual relevance, and the term workload data was not used in the laundry provisions or corresponding CLINs.
- The USAF revised the workload data in Modification No. A00006 and added Fisher House laundry CLINs.
- Modification Nos. A00015 and A00016 negotiated and bilaterally definitized increases to the CLIN prices, but did not change the firm-fixed-price structure.
- The revised workload data was created at least in part using Vectrus's records and records from the prior contractor, with Vectrus's participation.
- During the next four years, Vectrus laundered a lower volume of approximately 42 of the 49 item-types and a higher volume of approximately seven item-types than listed in the revised workload data.
- Vectrus submitted a certified claim based on a per-item cost for instances laundered above the workload data in contract option years three and four.
Parties
- Appellant
- Vectrus Systems Corporation
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Air Force (USAF)
- Contracting Agency
- U.S. Air Force (USAF)
- Contract Number
- FA3002-17-C-0001
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- St. Michael's Inc.No. 62226, 62271, 62272January 29, 2025
- NikSoft Systems Corp.No. 63423-ADROctober 2, 2024
- Colony ConstructionNo. 63630September 12, 2024
- Coppertop Enterprises, Inc.No. 63388, 63389, 63390, 63391May 2, 2024
- SDC Contracting, Inc.No. 63469March 12, 2024
- G-W Management Services, LLCNo. 63318December 26, 2023
Same Year
- Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc.No. 60979December 30, 2025
- Kallidus TechnologiesNo. 61377, 61976December 18, 2025
- Warfighter Defense, Inc.No. 63908, 63909December 11, 2025
- Targe Logistic Services CompanyNo. 63282December 10, 2025
- K2 Solutions, Inc.No. 62768December 9, 2025
- Paragon Defense Solutions, Inc.No. 64307December 8, 2025
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026