63444

Vectrus Systems Corporation

March 26, 2025Judge Smith
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationContract Changes / Constructive ChangesEquitable Adjustment (REA)

Vectrus Systems Corporation sought an equitable adjustment under a fixed-price laundry-services contract based on laundry volumes exceeding selected figures in revised workload data. The Board held that the workload data imposed no contractual limits and denied the appeal.

Material Facts

  • The USAF issued Base Operation Support Services Contract No. FA3002-17-C-0001 for services at Keesler Air Force Base.
  • The contract included four laundry-service provisions with corresponding CLINs that were firm fixed price per month, multiplied by 12 months per contract year.
  • The laundry CLINs did not specify a number, range, or limit of items to be serviced.
  • Appendix 15B contained workload data listing 34 individual item-types and a total for each one.
  • The contract did not define the workload data's contractual relevance, and the term workload data was not used in the laundry provisions or corresponding CLINs.
  • The USAF revised the workload data in Modification No. A00006 and added Fisher House laundry CLINs.
  • Modification Nos. A00015 and A00016 negotiated and bilaterally definitized increases to the CLIN prices, but did not change the firm-fixed-price structure.
  • The revised workload data was created at least in part using Vectrus's records and records from the prior contractor, with Vectrus's participation.
  • During the next four years, Vectrus laundered a lower volume of approximately 42 of the 49 item-types and a higher volume of approximately seven item-types than listed in the revised workload data.
  • Vectrus submitted a certified claim based on a per-item cost for instances laundered above the workload data in contract option years three and four.

Parties

Appellant
Vectrus Systems Corporation
Respondent Agency
U.S. Air Force (USAF)
Contracting Agency
U.S. Air Force (USAF)
Contract Number
FA3002-17-C-0001
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.