DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 2, 2012
CBCA 2474
ENVIRONMENTAL FORESTRY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Michael H. Church and Darren M. Digiactino of Stamper Rubens, P.S., Spokane, WA, counsel for Appellant.
Marissa J. Suarez, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Order
Environmental Forestry, Inc., appealed the decision of a contracting officer of the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service terminating for default a contract for thinning trees in Sierra National Forest, California. The appeal has been resolved through mediation jointly requested by the parties and conducted by a Board judge.
On July 31, 2012, the parties moved the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, with each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
__________________________________
2 CBCA 2474
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Environmental Forestry, Inc., CBCA 2474. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.