DISMISSED: May 30, 2012
CBCA 2498
CTI GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Lawrence P. Block of Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Robert D. English, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Order
This case involves a claim by CTI Global Solutions, Inc. (CTI) under purchase orders issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for the provision of services under a General Services Administration (GSA) schedule contract. CTI contends that it is entitled to be paid for its services at increased hourly rates for two reasons: first, because GSA failed to properly process a request for increased rates, and second, because the Department of Labor mandated, through wage determinations, increases in the health and welfare benefits for CTI’s personnel.
_________________________
2 CBCA 2498
In ruling on motions by the FBI, the Board denied CTI’s appeal with regard to the first of these reasons and denied it in predominant part with regard to the second. CTI Global Solutions, Inc. v. Department of Justice, CBCA 2498, 12-1 BCA ¶ 34,889 (2011). We allowed CTI to present evidence with regard to the portion of the case which survived. CTI provided some information to the FBI, and the parties engaged in settlement discussions. CTI has now filed a request that the Board dismiss the appeal.
The request is granted. The case is DISMISSED.
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in CTI Global Solutions, Inc., CBCA 2498. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.