CBCA 3301

ABM Services, INC

Oct 30, 2013Judge DanielsGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
ABM Services, INC
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 3301
Decided
Oct 30, 2013The decision states Oct 30, 2013 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Neel, Hooper & Banes, P.C.
Outcome
Settled
The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Bryant S. Banes and Stormy N. Hendershott
Neel, Hooper & Banes, P.C.
Houston, TX
For the respondent
Leonard E. Lucas III
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,171 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Oct 30, 2013 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: October 30, 2013

CBCA 3301

ABM SERVICES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Bryant S. Banes and Stormy N. Hendershott of Neel, Hooper & Banes, P.C., Houston, TX, counsel for Appellant.

Leonard E. Lucas III, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

Order

The General Services Administration (GSA) contracted with ABM Services, Inc.

(ABM) for the provision of operation and maintenance services for the Chet Holifield Federal Building in Laguna Niguel, California. ABM maintains that GSA did not pay for the final month of services ABM provided under the contract. GSA contends that it did not make payment in response to ABM’s final invoice because it had previously paid the contractor more than the total contract amount.

The parties have now settled their dispute and have jointly moved the Board to dismiss with prejudice ABM’s appeal of the contracting officer’s decision which denied the contractor’s claim.

The motion is granted. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_________________________

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in ABM Services, INC, CBCA 3301. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.