CBCA 387, 388, 399

Turner Construction Company

Sep 14, 2007Judge BorwickGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingGranted in part

Key Facts

Appellant
Turner Construction Company
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
Borwick
Case number
CBCA 387, 388, 399This cell names 3 dockets: 387, 388, 399.
Decided
Sep 14, 2007The decision states Sep 14, 2007 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Peckar & Abramson
Outcome
Granted in part
These appeals are GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $26,500,000 inclusive of interest under the Contract Disputes Act.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Payment and interestChanges and equitable adjustment

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Richard L. Abramson and Patrick J. Greene, Jr.
Peckar & Abramson
River Edge, NJ
For the respondent
Thomas Y. Hawkins and Robert M. Notigan and Richard Hughes
Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Michael DeChiara and Matthew S. Quinn and Christopher P. McCabe and Michael J. Vardaro and Michelle Fiorito
Zetlin & DeChiara LLP
New York, NY
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 2,259 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 14, 2007 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

3 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

GRANTED IN PART: September 14, 2007

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Richard L. Abramson and Patrick J. Greene, Jr., of Peckar & Abramson, River Edge, NJ, counsel for Appellant.

Thomas Y. Hawkins, Robert M. Notigan, and Richard Hughes, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC; and Michael DeChiara, Matthew S. Quinn, Christopher P. McCabe, Michael J. Vardaro, and Michelle Fiorito of Zetlin & DeChiara LLP, New York, NY, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges BORWICK, HYATT, and DeGRAFF.

BORWICK, Board Judge.

These appeals involve claims for remission of liquidated damages, equitable adjustment, breach, and rescission filed by appellant, Turner Construction Company, arising from its contract with respondent General Services Administration for the construction of the United States Courthouse and Federal Building, Islip, New York.

The appeals were originally filed at the General Services Board of Contract Appeals (GSBCA) as GSBCA 15502, 16055, and 16551. On January 6, 2007, pursuant to section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-163, 119 __________________________

_______________________________ ________________________________ Stat. 3391, the GSBCA was terminated and its cases, personnel, and other resources were transferred to the newly-established Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA). The appeals were re-docketed as CBCA 387, 388, and 399.

2CBCA 387, 388, 399

Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b), the parties have submitted a joint settlement stipulation setting forth the award in the amount of $26,500,000 inclusive of interest under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613. The parties state that the parties will not seek reconsideration of, or relief from, the Board’s decision and they will not appeal the decision. The Board adopts the parties’ stipulation by decision. Pursuant to Board Rule 25(b), the Board’s decision is an adjudication on the merits.

Decision

These appeals are GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $26,500,000 inclusive of interest under the Contract Disputes Act.

ANTHONY S. BORWICK

Board Judge

We concur:

CATHERINE B. HYATT

Board Judge

MARTHA H. DeGRAFF

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Turner Construction Company, CBCA 387, 388, 399. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.