GRANTED IN PART: September 22, 2010
CBCA 508
SIGAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Hal J. Perloff of Husch Blackwell Sanders, LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Leonard E. Lucas III, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), BORWICK, and DRUMMOND.
DRUMMOND, Board Judge.
This appeal was from a contracting officer’s decision regarding a claim submitted by appellant, Sigal Construction Corporation (Sigal), on behalf of itself and various subcontractors, to respondent, the General Service Administration (GSA), for $1,519,803. The claim relates to contract no. GS11P03MKC0047 for renovation and improvement work at the Harry S. Truman (Old State) Building in Washington, D.C.
2 CBCA 508
On September 16, 2010, the parties filed a “Stipulation for Judgment; Joint Certificate of Finality,” which states:
The parties jointly stipulate that Judgment should be entered in favor of . . .
Sigal Construction Corporation in the amount of $1,100,000, inclusive of costs, attorneys fees, and interest allowable under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601, et seq.
Pursuant to Rule 31 of the Board’s . . . Rules of Procedure, the parties further certify that they shall not seek review or reconsideration of judgement so rendered. With respect to the decision of the Board issued pursuant to this stipulation, the parties waive their rights to reconsideration under Rule 26, rights to relief from judgment under Rule 27, and rights to appeal the decision. Accordingly, the appeal is GRANTED IN PART. In accordance with the parties’ joint stipulation, the Board awards Sigal the sum of $1,100,000, inclusive of costs, attorneys fees, and interest under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006), to be paid from the permanent indefinite judgment fund, 31 U.S.C. § 1304.
We concur:
_______________________
JEROME M. DRUMMOND
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
ANTHONY S. BORWICK
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Sigal Construction Corporation, CBCA 508. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.