GRANTED IN PART: January 26, 2021
CBCA 6027
WAGEWORKS, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
Respondent.
Lars E. Anderson, Sally Ann Hostetler and James P. Miller of Odin Feldman
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Pittleman PC, Reston, VA; and Dale Bish of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, counsel for Appellant.
Nicole Lohr and James Muetzel, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges HYATT, KULLBERG, and SULLIVAN.
SULLIVAN, Board Judge.
By decision dated December 18, 2020, the Board granted the motion for summary judgment filed by appellant, WageWorks, Inc. (WageWorks), and denied the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by respondent, Office of Personnel Management (OPM). On January 15, 2021, pursuant to the Board’s order, the parties filed a joint stipulation that WageWorks is owed $6,216,118.92, for March 1, 2016, through August 31, 2016, based upon the Board’s December 18 decision. The parties also calculated the interest due to WageWorks, running from August 24, 2017, the date WageWorks submitted its claim to the contracting officer. With the interest, the parties stipulate that WageWorks is owed a total of $6,753,846.13.
Decision
WageWorks’ appeal is GRANTED IN PART. WageWorks shall be paid $6,216,118.92. WageWorks shall also be paid interest on that amount calculated from August 24, 2017, in accordance with the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 7109(a) (2018).
Marian E. Sullivan
Board Judge
We concur:
Catherine B. Hyatt
Board Judge
H. Chuck Kullberg
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in WageWorks, Inc., CBCA 6027. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.