5635857151

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

November 23, 2010Judge Younger
OtherCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Contract InterpretationPayment / Progress Payments / FinancingStatutory ComplianceDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. sought recovery of private force protection costs under two appeals involving the LOGCAP III contract. The Board denied the government's motions for indefinite stays pending resolution of a False Claims Act suit, concluding that the government had not shown sufficient hardship or inequity and that the requested stay was unreasonable.

Material Facts

  • The Army awarded KBR the LOGCAP III contract to provide selected support services for Army operations worldwide.
  • The LOGCAP III contract was a cost-plus-award-fee, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract.
  • The contract incorporated FAR 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment.
  • The Army issued four task orders to KBR to operate dining facilities in Kuwait and Iraq.
  • KBR awarded eleven subcontracts to Eurest Support Services Worldwide for dining-facility services, and KBR alleged that the subcontracts were firm, fixed-price subcontracts.
  • KBR's first appeal concerned private security costs incurred by the ESS dining-facilities subcontractor.
  • KBR's second appeal concerned indirect private security costs associated with KBR personnel in the Middle East.
  • DCAA issued a Form 1 suspending private armed security costs relating to the eleven ESS subcontracts.
  • DCAA later issued a Revised Form 1 disapproving private security costs associated with five task orders.
  • The government filed a False Claims Act suit alleging that KBR and its subcontractors used private armed security without required authorization and presented claims containing prohibited security costs.
  • The False Claims Act suit encompassed allegations involving more than 30 subcontractors, while ASBCA No. 56358 was confined to costs attributable to ESS.
  • ASBCA No. 56358 was filed two years before the district-court action, and the parties had engaged in discovery before the stay motions.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Army
Contracting Agency
Army
Contract Number
DAAA09-02-D-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.