56743

Smart Power Systems, Inc.

November 24, 2010Judge James
Denied / Government PrevailedTermination for DefaultAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverFailure to Prosecute / Dismissal

Smart Power Systems, Inc. appealed the default termination of its supply contract for power supplies by the contracting officer. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment, affirming the termination.

Material Facts

  • The Army Communications-Electronics Life Cycle Management Command awarded Contract No. W15P7T-06-D-N210 to Smart Power Systems, Inc. for power supplies.
  • The contract was an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity type contract that provided for issuance of delivery orders.
  • The contract included the FAR 52.209-3 clause and incorporated by reference the 52.249-8 clause.
  • SPS submitted a First Article Test Plan (FATP) late and received multiple comments on its deficiencies before approval.
  • The contracting officer issued a cure notice to SPS, which SPS failed to adequately respond to.
  • The contracting officer terminated the contract on 14 November 2008 due to SPS's failure to cure performance issues.

Parties

Appellant
Smart Power Systems, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Army
Contracting Agency
Army Communications-Electronics Life Cycle Management Command
Contract Number
W15P7T-06-D-N210
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.