AECOM Government Services, Inc.
AECOM Government Services, Inc. sought leave to file an untimely motion for reconsideration based on allegedly newly discovered evidence concerning the government's knowledge of an offshore subsidiary's FICA-tax exemption. The Board denied leave and denied relief under Rule 60(b)(2), concluding that the evidence was not newly discovered and was cumulative, immaterial, and unlikely to change the outcome.
Material Facts
- AECOM was the appellant under Contract No. W91GY0-08-D-0001.
- The prior Board decision denied AECOM's partial motion for summary judgment and granted the government's motion for summary judgment in part.
- The prior decision was dispositive of AECOM's claim that the government breached the implied warranty of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
- AECOM proffered excerpts from the deposition transcript of MAJ Renee Russo, the government's price evaluator and source selection evaluation board chairman.
- AECOM asserted that the government knew AECOM was exempt from FICA taxes when the parties entered into the contract.
- The contract did not contain a provision concerning a special benefit relative to FICA taxes.
Parties
- Appellant
- AECOM Government Services, Inc.
- Contract Number
- W91GY0-08-D-0001
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Advanced Constructors International, LLCNo. 58604, 58739, 58740, 58741October 8, 2015
- Capy Machine Shop, Inc.No. 59085October 8, 2015
- Capy Machine Shop, Inc.No. 59133October 8, 2015
- Areebel Engineering & LogisticsNo. 58648, 58649, 58650, 58651October 5, 2015
- Hashmat Khalil Rezai Road & Construction ComanyNo. 58868September 1, 2015
- Development & Evolution Construction Co.No. 59462September 1, 2015
Same Year
- Joint Venture Makyal Ins. Ve Tic. A.S. & Mehmet Erdal Kamisli Co. Ltd.No. 56956December 28, 2011
- Distributed Solutions, Inc.No. 57266December 28, 2011
- Quimba Software, Inc.No. 57636December 19, 2011
- American General Trading & Contracting, WLLNo. 56758December 13, 2011
- Harry RichardsonNo. 57582December 9, 2011
- Sharp Electronics CorporationNo. 57583December 6, 2011
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026