56861

AECOM Government Services, Inc.

January 19, 2011Judge Tunks
Denied / Government PrevailedMistake / Reformation

AECOM Government Services, Inc. sought reformation of an indefinite quantity contract to recover after-imposed FICA taxes resulting from the HEART Act. On the government's motion for summary judgment, the Board held that the asserted mistake concerned a future change in law rather than an existing fact and granted the motion, denying the appeal.

Material Facts

  • The Joint Contracting Command—Iraq/Afghanistan awarded AECOM an indefinite quantity contract to establish a national logistics depot at Taji, Iraq.
  • The contract's initial ordering period was from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2009.
  • AECOM GSS, Ltd., AECOM's wholly owned offshore subsidiary, performed the work.
  • At contract award, offshore subsidiaries of United States corporations contracting with the United States government were not required to pay FICA taxes for United States citizens and residents working abroad.
  • AECOM did not include FICA taxes in its labor rates for the contract.
  • The HEART Act was signed into law approximately six months after award and required wholly owned subsidiaries of United States corporations contracting with the United States government to pay FICA taxes for United States citizens and residents working abroad.
  • AECOM began paying FICA taxes relating to work under the contract on 1 August 2008.
  • No contract clause protecting AECOM from a change to the tax status of offshore subsidiaries was included, and there was no evidence that such a clause was discussed during negotiations.

Parties

Appellant
AECOM Government Services, Inc.
Contracting Agency
Joint Contracting Command—Iraq/Afghanistan (JCC-IA)
Contract Number
W91GY0-08-D-0001
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.