5625756337

CI2, Inc.

August 12, 2011Judge Delman
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

CI2, Inc. appealed against the Department of the Army regarding contract performance and payment disputes under Contract No. DAB NO 1-03-C-0007. The Board denied both parties' motions for summary judgment.

Material Facts

  • The U.S. Army issued Solicitation No. DABNOI-03-R-000I for non-personal services to support the Installation Access Control System (lACS).
  • CI2, Inc. was the only offeror and was awarded Contract No. DABNO 1-03-C-0007.
  • The contract included various positions with specified monthly payments for registrars, area managers, and a project manager.
  • The government reduced the number of months for registrars and increased temporary registrars under Modification No. P00002.
  • Appellant invoiced the government monthly based on the time worked by its personnel.
  • The government denied payment for invoices, claiming appellant was not entitled to payment for less performance than specified.
  • Appellant submitted a certified claim for $865,478.61 based on denied invoices, which was denied by the Army.
  • The government determined that appellant's prices were unreasonable prior to denying award terms.

Parties

Appellant
CI2, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
Contract No. DAB NO 1-03-C-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.