56481

Parsons-UXB Joint Venture

January 12, 2012Judge Melnick
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)

Parsons-UXB Joint Venture sought to exclude a government expert report and testimony concerning the foreseeability of general excise tax cost overruns and alleged reimbursement payments. The Board granted the motion in limine and excluded both the report and testimony because the opinions did not require specialized knowledge, addressed legal issues, or would not assist the trier of fact.

Material Facts

  • The Navy awarded the Joint Venture a cost plus award fee, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract to remove unexploded ordnance.
  • The Joint Venture sought reimbursement for additional general excise taxes imposed by Hawaii upon the Joint Venture and its partners.
  • The Board previously held that the Joint Venture's invoice for reimbursement of the general excise tax assessment exceeded the total contract funding allotted for costs.
  • The Board previously determined that a trial was required concerning whether and when the Joint Venture had reason to foresee liability for general excise taxes beyond existing funding.
  • Mr. Anderson's report stated that the general excise tax cost overruns were not unforeseeable.
  • Mr. Anderson's report stated that the record contained no evidence that the Joint Venture had reimbursed either partner for the disputed general excise tax costs.
  • Mr. Anderson was a certified public accountant and a certified internal auditor.
  • Mr. Anderson did not analyze the Joint Venture's or its partners' accounting and financial records in support of his foreseeability opinion.
  • The Joint Venture represented that whether it had paid its partners was not in dispute.

Parties

Appellant
Parsons-UXB Joint Venture
Respondent Agency
Navy
Contracting Agency
Navy
Contract Number
N62742-95-D-1369
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.