Parsons-UXB Joint Venture
Parsons-UXB Joint Venture sought to exclude a government expert report and testimony concerning the foreseeability of general excise tax cost overruns and alleged reimbursement payments. The Board granted the motion in limine and excluded both the report and testimony because the opinions did not require specialized knowledge, addressed legal issues, or would not assist the trier of fact.
Material Facts
- The Navy awarded the Joint Venture a cost plus award fee, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract to remove unexploded ordnance.
- The Joint Venture sought reimbursement for additional general excise taxes imposed by Hawaii upon the Joint Venture and its partners.
- The Board previously held that the Joint Venture's invoice for reimbursement of the general excise tax assessment exceeded the total contract funding allotted for costs.
- The Board previously determined that a trial was required concerning whether and when the Joint Venture had reason to foresee liability for general excise taxes beyond existing funding.
- Mr. Anderson's report stated that the general excise tax cost overruns were not unforeseeable.
- Mr. Anderson's report stated that the record contained no evidence that the Joint Venture had reimbursed either partner for the disputed general excise tax costs.
- Mr. Anderson was a certified public accountant and a certified internal auditor.
- Mr. Anderson did not analyze the Joint Venture's or its partners' accounting and financial records in support of his foreseeability opinion.
- The Joint Venture represented that whether it had paid its partners was not in dispute.
Parties
- Appellant
- Parsons-UXB Joint Venture
- Respondent Agency
- Navy
- Contracting Agency
- Navy
- Contract Number
- N62742-95-D-1369
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- HECO Pacific Manufacturing, Inc.No. 63217, 64512September 1, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- ACC Construction Co., Inc.No. 63528, 64067July 16, 2026
- Gibraltar-Caddell, a Joint VentureNo. 64379July 13, 2026
- Akima Range Readiness Operations, LLCNo. 64012-ADRJune 4, 2026
- Envistacom, LLCNo. 63796May 13, 2026
Same Year
- Gray Personnel, Inc.No. 54652, 55833December 31, 2012
- ECC, InternationalNo. 55781December 28, 2012
- DODS, Inc.December 18, 2012
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 57576, 57679December 17, 2012
- TMS Envirocon, Inc.December 12, 2012
- The Public Warehousing CompanyDecember 3, 2012
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.No. 62638, 63879May 6, 2026
- CACI International, Inc.No. 63663March 10, 2026