The Boeing Company
The Boeing Company appealed a contracting officer's denial of a sponsored claim seeking indemnification for environmental response and remediation costs and toxic-tort litigation costs arising from Lockheed's SRAM propulsion work. On cross-motions for summary judgment concerning laches and contractual notice, and on Boeing's motion to strike, the Board denied all motions because material factual disputes remained.
Material Facts
- The Air Force awarded Boeing five SRAM development and production contracts between 1966 and 1973.
- Boeing awarded Lockheed a development subcontract and four production subcontracts for the SRAM propulsion system.
- The prime contracts and subcontracts contained indemnification provisions concerning unusually hazardous risks, together with notice and insurance provisions.
- Lockheed performed at least part of the subcontract work at its Redlands, California facility.
- TCE and ammonium perchlorate were associated with contamination and pollution at or near the Redlands facility.
- The Water Board issued cleanup and abatement orders concerning the Redlands facility and required remedial measures.
- Third-party environmental and toxic-tort litigation followed, including the Carrillo and Acklin actions and a state CERCLA action.
- Lockheed sent Boeing a written indemnification demand dated 23 May 1997.
- Boeing's counsel stated in January 1998 that Boeing intended to inform its government customer, but Boeing did not thereafter inform the government of Lockheed's demand.
- Lockheed's outside counsel sent an indemnification request to an Air Force attorney dated 29 March 2000.
- Boeing submitted the sponsored claim to the contracting officer on 6 February 2004.
- The record included evidence of deceased witnesses, destroyed documents, and diminished recollections concerning contract formation and the environmental events.
Parties
- Appellant
- The Boeing Company
- Respondent Agency
- Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Air Force
- Contract Number
- AF33(657)-16584
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Alderman Building Company, Inc.No. 58082May 21, 2020
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 61790December 18, 2019
- Arab Shah Construction CompanyNo. 61565November 4, 2019
- PIKA-Pirnie JV, LLCNo. 61597November 4, 2019
- Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc.No. 61535July 22, 2019
Same Year
- Gray Personnel, Inc.No. 54652, 55833December 31, 2012
- ECC, InternationalNo. 55781December 28, 2012
- DODS, Inc.December 18, 2012
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 57576, 57679December 17, 2012
- TMS Envirocon, Inc.December 12, 2012
- The Public Warehousing CompanyDecember 3, 2012
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026