58578

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

September 9, 2013Judge Grant
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedContract InterpretationCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostCDA JurisdictionDCAA Involved

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. sought a contract interpretation concerning whether Clause H-29 permitted reimbursement for replacing employees who departed theater before 179 days for reasons outside the contractor's discretion. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss, retaining jurisdiction because the dispute was live, a declaratory ruling would materially assist resolution, and the alternative remedy was not adequately available at that time.

Material Facts

  • The Army awarded KBRSI Contract No. DAAA09-02-D-0007 for combat support and combat service support to military personnel in contingency operations worldwide.
  • The LOGCAP III contract included Clause H-29, Tour of Duty/Hours of Work, concerning rotation of contractor employees and costs associated with employees deployed less than or more than 179 days.
  • The LOGCAP IV contract contained an identical Tour of Duty/Hours of Work clause, numbered H-26.
  • KBRSI interpreted Clause H-29 to distinguish voluntary rotation from employee departures for reasons not involving KBRSI's discretion.
  • DCAA audited KBRSI's fiscal year 2004 incurred travel cost submission and issued a notice disapproving travel costs for employees deployed in theater less than 179 days.
  • The Army had not disallowed costs invoiced and paid based on KBRSI's interpretation of Clause H-29 and had not adopted DCAA's position.
  • DCAA was conducting additional audits concerning the same issue for other fiscal years.
  • The contracting officer characterized KBRSI's position as a bad assumption and stated that the larger Form 1 issue remained unsettled.
  • The LOGCAP III contract had not been closed out, and the government had not finalized KBRSI's incurred costs since 2003.
  • A qui tam case under the False Claims Act concerned allegations involving billing for mobilization and demobilization costs for personnel deployed less than 179 days.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Army
Contracting Agency
Army
Contract Number
DAAA09-02-D-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.