Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc.
Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc. appealed a DCMA contracting officer's determination that discontinued operations costs allocated to its contracts were unallowable. The Board denied dismissal without prejudice but suspended proceedings to permit coordinated resolution of the closely connected cost dispute and related request for equitable adjustment.
Material Facts
- NASA entered into Contract No. NAS8-01140 with The Boeing Company effective 1 January 2002 for the Space Shuttle Main Engine contract.
- United Technologies Corporation purchased Rocketdyne from The Boeing Company in August 2005 and created PWR as a wholly-owned subsidiary.
- The Boeing Company, PWR, and the government executed a novation agreement effective 2 August 2005 recognizing PWR as the successor party to the listed government contracts.
- California environmental authorities directed UTC to remove potentially hazardous substances from the former Chemical Systems Division site.
- PWR stated that discontinued operations costs, including CSD costs, were allocated to PWR under UTC's disclosed and established practices.
- Modification No. 097 added new work and included a CSD cost re-opener addressing costs not included in the applicable FPRA.
- The DACO's final decision concerned CSD discontinued operations costs claimed in PWR's calendar year 2005 home office overhead cost proposal.
- PWR submitted an REA to NASA's procurement contracting officer under the SSME contract.
- The government's CSD cost disallowance and PWR's REA concerned closely connected CSD costs.
Parties
- Appellant
- Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contracting Agency
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Contract Number
- NAS8-01140
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Pratt & Whitney, a division of Raytheon Technologies CompanyNo. 59222November 22, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58212, 58753June 14, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58841June 14, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58842June 14, 2021
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59439, 59440, 59441June 14, 2021
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 60699June 14, 2021
Same Year
- WorleyParsons International, Inc.No. 57930December 20, 2013
- TTF, L.L.C.No. 58452December 19, 2013
- Bruce E. ZoellerNo. 56578December 17, 2013
- New Iraq Ahd CompanyNo. 58800December 17, 2013
- Linc Government Services, LLCNo. 58561, 58562, 58563, 58565, 58566, 58567December 5, 2013
- Fluor CorporationNo. 57852December 5, 2013
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.No. 62638, 63879May 6, 2026
- CACI International, Inc.No. 63663March 10, 2026