58307

Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc.

March 4, 2013Judge Scott
OtherCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostContract InterpretationDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc. appealed a DCMA contracting officer's determination that discontinued operations costs allocated to its contracts were unallowable. The Board denied dismissal without prejudice but suspended proceedings to permit coordinated resolution of the closely connected cost dispute and related request for equitable adjustment.

Material Facts

  • NASA entered into Contract No. NAS8-01140 with The Boeing Company effective 1 January 2002 for the Space Shuttle Main Engine contract.
  • United Technologies Corporation purchased Rocketdyne from The Boeing Company in August 2005 and created PWR as a wholly-owned subsidiary.
  • The Boeing Company, PWR, and the government executed a novation agreement effective 2 August 2005 recognizing PWR as the successor party to the listed government contracts.
  • California environmental authorities directed UTC to remove potentially hazardous substances from the former Chemical Systems Division site.
  • PWR stated that discontinued operations costs, including CSD costs, were allocated to PWR under UTC's disclosed and established practices.
  • Modification No. 097 added new work and included a CSD cost re-opener addressing costs not included in the applicable FPRA.
  • The DACO's final decision concerned CSD discontinued operations costs claimed in PWR's calendar year 2005 home office overhead cost proposal.
  • PWR submitted an REA to NASA's procurement contracting officer under the SSME contract.
  • The government's CSD cost disallowance and PWR's REA concerned closely connected CSD costs.

Parties

Appellant
Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contracting Agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Contract Number
NAS8-01140
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.