57826

South Carolina Public Service Authority

February 14, 2013Judge Freeman
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedQuantum / Damages

The South Carolina Public Service Authority appealed a contracting officer's decision denying indemnification for costs incurred due to third-party claims related to a government project. The Board sustained the appeal, awarding the appellant $234,865,797.11 with interest.

Material Facts

  • Santee Cooper's indemnification claim arises from civil actions against it for flooding caused by the Cooper River Re-diversion Project.
  • The government constructed and owned the Cooper River Re-diversion Project.
  • Contract 0005 required Santee Cooper to operate the St. Stephen hydroplant under specific conditions.
  • The flooding at issue began in 1993, leading to litigation initiated by landowners.
  • Santee Cooper's indemnification claim was submitted on 20 August 2001, initially for $576,437.98.
  • The District Court awarded damages to landowners in the amount of $3,810,650 plus interest and later awarded additional amounts.
  • Santee Cooper calculated total damages and interest paid to landowners at $231,922,189.47.

Parties

Appellant
South Carolina Public Service Authority
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Charleston
Contract Number
Contract No. DACW60-77-C-0005
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.