5720158166

Nelson, Inc.

December 15, 2015Judge Peacock
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedTermination for DefaultAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

Nelson, Inc. appealed the termination for default of its contract for construction work on the Mississippi River, while a separate appeal regarding a termination for convenience settlement proposal was dismissed as premature.

Material Facts

  • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers awarded the contract to Nelson, Inc. for $9,241,900 for construction of stone dikes and other features at four sites on the Mississippi River.
  • The contract included separate pricing for each activity related to each of the four sites.
  • The Corps concluded that Nelson was non-responsible based on a pre-award survey but later issued a Certificate of Competency.
  • The contract included FAR clauses regarding commencement, prosecution, and completion of work, as well as default and termination for convenience.
  • The Corps issued a stop-work order due to perceived performance deficiencies and later terminated the contract for default.

Parties

Appellant
Nelson, Inc.
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Engineer District, Memphis
Contract Number
W912EQ-09-C-0025
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.