59016

Lean Construction and Engineering Co.

May 18, 2016Judge Paul
Denied / Government PrevailedTermination for Default

Lean Construction and Engineering Co. appealed a contracting officer's decision partially terminating its construction contract for default. The Board denied the appeal, affirming the termination was justified due to Lean's failure to complete the work as required.

Material Facts

  • Lean was awarded Contract No. W56SGK-13-C-7073 for construction work in Afghanistan.
  • The contract was for specified construction work to augment force protection measures at an Afghan National Army Logistics depot.
  • The contract completion date was initially set for 90 days after the notice to proceed, which was issued on 21 April 2013.
  • Lean's workers faced access issues, leading to extensions of the completion date to 5 September 2013.
  • The contracting officer issued multiple letters of concern regarding Lean's performance and deficiencies.
  • A site inspection on 29 September 2013 revealed that Lean had only completed 73.96 percent of the project.
  • The contracting officer terminated the contract for default due to Lean's failure to complete the work and rectify deficiencies.

Parties

Appellant
Lean Construction and Engineering Co.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W56SGK-13-C-7073
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.