59794

Alaska Aerospace Corporation

September 13, 2016Judge Melnick
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)DCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Alaska Aerospace Corporation appealed a contracting officer's final decision disallowing costs for employee pension plan contributions. The Board sustained the appeal, ruling that the government failed to prove its claim.

Material Facts

  • The Missile Defense Agency awarded Contract No. HQ0006-03-D-0043 to AAC for support services and use of the Kodiak Launch Complex in Alaska.
  • The contract was a cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract.
  • The contract incorporated by reference FAR clause 52.216-7, which allows for the reimbursement of contributions to employee pension plans.
  • AAC submitted its FY08 Incurred Cost Proposal, which included costs for employee pension plan contributions paid by both AAC and the State of Alaska.
  • The contracting officer issued a COFD disallowing $302,637 in employee pension plan contributions based on an audit report prepared by the DCAA.
  • The COFD did not state that the government had previously paid AAC, only that the contracting officer was imposing a penalty.
  • The DCAA audit report states that the questioned costs in AAC's FY08 proposal are not subject to penalty.
  • The government admitted in its answer that penalties are not an issue in this appeal.

Parties

Appellant
Alaska Aerospace Corporation
Contract Number
HQ0006-03-D-0043
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.