Alaska Aerospace Corporation
Alaska Aerospace Corporation appealed a contracting officer's final decision disallowing costs for employee pension plan contributions. The Board sustained the appeal, ruling that the government failed to prove its claim.
Material Facts
- The Missile Defense Agency awarded Contract No. HQ0006-03-D-0043 to AAC for support services and use of the Kodiak Launch Complex in Alaska.
- The contract was a cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract.
- The contract incorporated by reference FAR clause 52.216-7, which allows for the reimbursement of contributions to employee pension plans.
- AAC submitted its FY08 Incurred Cost Proposal, which included costs for employee pension plan contributions paid by both AAC and the State of Alaska.
- The contracting officer issued a COFD disallowing $302,637 in employee pension plan contributions based on an audit report prepared by the DCAA.
- The COFD did not state that the government had previously paid AAC, only that the contracting officer was imposing a penalty.
- The DCAA audit report states that the questioned costs in AAC's FY08 proposal are not subject to penalty.
- The government admitted in its answer that penalties are not an issue in this appeal.
Parties
- Appellant
- Alaska Aerospace Corporation
- Contract Number
- HQ0006-03-D-0043
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- HECO Pacific Manufacturing, Inc.No. 63217, 64512September 1, 2026
- Erik Robinson d/b/a The Artwork FactoryNo. 63727, 63809August 19, 2026
- ACC Construction Co., Inc.No. 63528, 64067July 16, 2026
- Gibraltar-Caddell, a Joint VentureNo. 64379July 13, 2026
- Akima Range Readiness Operations, LLCNo. 64012-ADRJune 4, 2026
- Envistacom, LLCNo. 63796May 13, 2026
Same Year
- Sparton DeLeon Springs, LLCNo. 60416December 28, 2016
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59873, 60885December 21, 2016
- Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, Inc.No. 59508, 59509December 20, 2016
- CDM Constructors, Inc.No. 59524December 20, 2016
- Astro Systems, Inc.No. 60769, 60781December 20, 2016
- First Division Design, LLCNo. 60884-975December 15, 2016
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.No. 62638, 63879May 6, 2026
- CACI International, Inc.No. 63663March 10, 2026