Parsons Government Services, Inc.
Parsons Government Services, Inc. appealed the deemed denial of a claim alleging that the government improperly used operation and maintenance funds instead of military construction funds, rendering the contract void ab initio and entitling Parsons to recover in quantum meruit. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and dismissed the appeal with prejudice.
Material Facts
- The government awarded Contract No. M67854-09-D-8000 for Military Operations in Urban Terrain training systems for the United States Marine Corps.
- The contract was a requirements contract with a five-year ordering period.
- The contract was funded with operation and maintenance funds rather than military construction funds.
- The contract included construction work and was not funded with military construction funds.
- The contract was modified to add Davis-Bacon Act wage determinations.
- Parsons alleged that the predecessor contract had been funded with military construction funds.
- Parsons alleged that the contract lacked proper terms, including terms requiring Davis-Bacon Act wage determinations and FAR clauses applicable to apprentices and disputes in labor standards.
Parties
- Appellant
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- United States Marine Corps
- Contract Number
- M67854-09-D-8000
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- ECC International, LLCNo. 58993, 60167, 60283February 24, 2022
- ECC International, LLCNo. 60167January 25, 2022
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Sungjee Construction Co., Ltd.No. 62002, 62170March 23, 2021
- General AtomicsNo. 61495January 5, 2021
- Engility LLCNo. 61281August 11, 2020
Same Year
- Columbia State Bank f/k/a Castle-Rose, Inc.No. 59531December 28, 2017
- Fluor Federal Solutions, LLCNo. 61431-983December 28, 2017
- Goodwill Services, Inc.No. 61439December 27, 2017
- Suffolk Construction Company, Inc.No. 60990December 27, 2017
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 60218December 21, 2017
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 60221December 21, 2017
Same Issue
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Visionary Construction, Inc. dba Visionary ServicesNo. 64426August 20, 2026
- Dashti Sanat Logistics and General ContractingNo. 63643August 11, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- PAE Aviation and Technical Services, LLCNo. 63911November 21, 2025
- Science Applications International CorporationNo. 63509May 27, 2025