Dashti Sanat Logistics and General Contracting
Dashti Sanat Logistics and General Contracting appealed a claim arising from damage to vehicles leased to the Army under a BPA. The Board denied the government's motion for summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact remained regarding whether the contract was void and whether Dashti was a covered entity under NDAA Section 841.
Material Facts
- The Army issued Dashti a BPA for the lease of non-tactical vehicles in northern Iraq.
- The Army issued an order under the BPA for lease of vehicles to be delivered to Erbil International Airport, Iraq.
- Dashti performed the order, establishing a contractual obligation between the parties.
- The Army exercised options through modifications that extended services through March 2018.
- The Army contracting officer acknowledged that vehicles sustained damages and determined that Dashti was eligible for an equitable adjustment.
- The Army prepared a draft modification addressing vehicle damages, but the record contains no evidence that it was executed.
- USCENTCOM identified Dashti as providing funds under a covered contract directly to covered persons or entities, but the memorandum did not identify Dashti as a covered entity.
- The Army HCA later issued a memorandum purporting to void all past Army contracts with Dashti without identifying a specific contract.
- The HCA memorandum did not determine that the contract at issue provided funds directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
- The record contained no evidence supporting the government's assertion that Dashti was itself a covered person or entity.
Parties
- Appellant
- Dashti Sanat Logistics and General Contracting
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army
- Contracting Agency
- U.S. Army
- Contract Number
- W56KGZ-17-A-6014
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Warrior Construction Services, Inc.No. 64497August 7, 2026
- MPG WestNo. 61100-ADR, 61560-ADR, 61570-ADRJuly 24, 2026
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.No. 63773-ADR, 63831-ADR, 63853-ADR, 63854-ADR, 63855-ADR, 63856-ADR, 63857-ADRJune 22, 2026
- NES Pacific Limited Liability Co.No. 63710-EAJAJune 16, 2026
- NES Pacific Limited Liability Co.No. 63710June 8, 2026
Same Year
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
Same Issue
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Marine Hydraulics International, LLCNo. 63429, 63511August 6, 2026
- PDO Ahusaka Joint Venture LLCNo. 64490July 23, 2026
- ACC Construction Co., Inc.No. 63528, 64067July 16, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468May 21, 2026
- Jabez-Absher Small Business Joint VentureNo. 63898October 2, 2025