63643

Dashti Sanat Logistics and General Contracting

August 11, 2026Judge Arnett
Denied / Government PrevailedEquitable Adjustment (REA)Quantum / DamagesCDA JurisdictionStatutory Compliance

Dashti Sanat Logistics and General Contracting appealed a claim arising from damage to vehicles leased to the Army under a BPA. The Board denied the government's motion for summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact remained regarding whether the contract was void and whether Dashti was a covered entity under NDAA Section 841.

Material Facts

  • The Army issued Dashti a BPA for the lease of non-tactical vehicles in northern Iraq.
  • The Army issued an order under the BPA for lease of vehicles to be delivered to Erbil International Airport, Iraq.
  • Dashti performed the order, establishing a contractual obligation between the parties.
  • The Army exercised options through modifications that extended services through March 2018.
  • The Army contracting officer acknowledged that vehicles sustained damages and determined that Dashti was eligible for an equitable adjustment.
  • The Army prepared a draft modification addressing vehicle damages, but the record contains no evidence that it was executed.
  • USCENTCOM identified Dashti as providing funds under a covered contract directly to covered persons or entities, but the memorandum did not identify Dashti as a covered entity.
  • The Army HCA later issued a memorandum purporting to void all past Army contracts with Dashti without identifying a specific contract.
  • The HCA memorandum did not determine that the contract at issue provided funds directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
  • The record contained no evidence supporting the government's assertion that Dashti was itself a covered person or entity.

Parties

Appellant
Dashti Sanat Logistics and General Contracting
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army
Contract Number
W56KGZ-17-A-6014
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.